allemand anglais arabe bulgare chinois coréen croate danois espagnol estonien finnois français grec hébreu hindi hongrois islandais indonésien italien japonais letton lituanien malgache néerlandais norvégien persan polonais portugais roumain russe serbe slovaque slovène suédois tchèque thai turc vietnamien
allemand anglais arabe bulgare chinois coréen croate danois espagnol estonien finnois français grec hébreu hindi hongrois islandais indonésien italien japonais letton lituanien malgache néerlandais norvégien persan polonais portugais roumain russe serbe slovaque slovène suédois tchèque thai turc vietnamien

définition - Late_Heavy_Bombardment

voir la définition de Wikipedia

   Publicité ▼


Late Heavy Bombardment


The Late Heavy Bombardment (commonly referred to as the lunar cataclysm, or LHB) is a period of time approximately 4.1 to 3.8 billion years ago (Ga) during which a large number of impact craters are believed to have formed on the Moon, and by inference on Earth, Mercury, Venus, and Mars as well. The LHB is "late" only in relation to the main period of accretion, when the Earth and the other three rocky planets first formed and gained most of their mass; in relation to Earth or solar system history as a whole, it is still a fairly early phase. The evidence for this event comes primarily from the dating of lunar samples, which indicates that most impact melt rocks formed in this rather narrow interval of time. While many hypotheses have been put forth to explain a spike in the flux of either asteroidal or cometary materials in the inner solar system, no consensus yet exists as to its cause. The Nice model popular among planetary scientists postulates that the gas giant planets underwent orbital migration at this time, scattering objects in the asteroid belt and/or Kuiper belt on eccentric orbits that crossed those of the terrestrial planets. Nevertheless, some researchers argue that the lunar sample data do not require a cataclysmic cratering event near 3.9 Ga, and that the apparent clustering of impact melt ages near this time is an artifact of sampling material affected by a single large impact basin.[1]

  Artist's impression of the moon during the Late Heavy Bombardment (Lunar Cataclysm) and today


  Evidence for a cataclysm

The main piece of evidence for a lunar cataclysm comes from the radiometric ages of impact melt rocks that were collected during the Apollo missions. The majority of these impact melts are believed to have formed during the collision of asteroids or comets tens of kilometers across, forming impact craters hundreds of kilometers in diameter. The Apollo 15, 16, and 17 landing sites were chosen as a result of their proximity to the Imbrium, Nectaris, and Serenitatis basins.

Under study on Earth, the ages of impact melts collected at these sites clustered between about 3.8 and 4.1 Ga. The apparent clustering of ages of these was first noticed in the mid-1970s by Fouad Tera, Dimitri Papanastassiou, and Gerald Wasserburg who postulated that the ages record an intense bombardment of the Moon[2]. They called it the "lunar cataclysm" and proposed that it represented a dramatic increase in the rate of bombardment of the Moon around 3.9 Ga. If these impact melts were derived from these three basins, then not only did these three prominent impact basins form within a short interval of time, but so did many others based on stratigraphic grounds. At the time, the conclusion was considered controversial.

As more data has become available, particularly from lunar meteorites, this theory, while still controversial, has gained in popularity. The lunar meteorites are believed to randomly sample the lunar surface, and at least some of these should have originated from regions far from the Apollo landing sites. Many of the feldspathic lunar meteorites probably originated from the lunar far side, and impact melts within these have recently been dated. Consistent with the cataclysm hypothesis, none of their ages was found to be older than about 3.9 Ga.[3] Nevertheless, the ages do not "cluster" at this date, but span between 2.5 and 3.9 Ga.[4]

Studies of the highland crater size distributions suggest that the same family of projectiles struck Mercury and the Moon during late heavy bombardment.[5] If the history of decay of late heavy bombardment on Mercury also followed the history of late heavy bombardment on the Moon, the youngest large basin discovered, Caloris, is comparable in age to the youngest large lunar basins, Orientale and Imbrium, and all of the plains units are older than 3 billion years.[6]

  Criticisms of the cataclysm hypothesis

While the cataclysm hypothesis has recently gained in popularity, particularly among dynamicists who have identified possible causes for such a phenomenon, the cataclysm hypothesis is still a controversial theory that is based on debatable assumptions. Two criticisms are that (1) the "cluster" of impact ages could be an artifact of sampling a single basin's ejecta, and (2) that the lack of impact melt rocks older than about 4.1 Ga is related to all such samples having been pulverized, or their ages being reset.

The first criticism concerns the origin of the impact melt rocks that were sampled at the Apollo landing sites. While these impact melts have been commonly attributed to having been derived from the closest basin, it has been argued that a large portion of these might instead be derived from the Imbrium basin.[7] The Imbrium impact basin is the youngest and largest of the multi-ring basins found on the central nearside of the Moon, and quantitative modeling shows that significant amounts of ejecta from this event should be present at all of the Apollo landing sites. According to this alternative hypothesis, the cluster of impact melt ages near 3.9 Ga simply reflects material being collected from a single impact event, Imbrium, and not several.

A second criticism concerns the significance of the lack of impact melt rocks older than about 4.1 Ga. One hypothesis for this observation that does not involve a cataclysm is that old melt rocks did exist, but that their ages have all been reset by the continuous effects of impact cratering over the past 4 billion years. Furthermore, it is possible that these putative samples could all have been pulverized to such small sizes that it is impossible to obtain age determinations using standard radiometric methods.[citation needed]

  Geological consequences on Earth

If a lunar cataclysmic cratering event were truly to have occurred on the Moon, the Earth would have been affected as well. Extrapolating lunar cratering rates to Earth at this time suggest that the following number of craters would have formed:[citation needed]

  • 22,000 or more impact craters with diameters >20 km (12 mi),
  • about 40 impact basins with diameters about 1,000 km (620 mi),
  • several impact basins with diameter about 5,000 km (3,100 mi),

Serious environmental damage would occur about every 100 years, although life is not known to have existed on Earth at this time.

Prior to the introduction of the Late Heavy Bombardment theory, it was generally assumed that the Earth had remained molten until about 3.8 Ga. This date could be found in all of the oldest known rocks from around the world, and appeared to represent a strong "cutoff point" beyond which older rocks could not be found. These dates remained fairly constant even across various dating methods, including the system considered the most accurate and least affected by environment, uranium-lead dating of zircons. As no older rocks could be found, it was generally assumed that the Earth had remained molten until this point in time, which defined the boundary between the earlier Hadean and later Archean eons.

Older rocks could be found, however, in the form of chips off asteroids that fall to Earth as meteorites. Like the rocks on Earth, asteroids also show a strong cutoff point, at about 4.6 Ga, which is assumed to be the time when the first solids formed in the protoplanetary disk around the then-young Sun. The Hadean, then, was the period of time between the formation of these early rocks in space, and the eventual solidification of the Earth's crust, some 700 million years later. This time would include the accretion of the planets from the disk and its slow cooling into a solid as the gravitational potential energy of this collapse was released.

Later calculations showed that the rate of collapse and cooling was dependent on the size of the body, and applying this to an Earth-sized mass suggested this should have happened quite quickly, as quickly as 100 million years.[8] The difference between measurement and theory was something of a mystery at the time.

The Late Heavy Bombardment is now offered as an explanation of this oddity. Under this model, the rocks dating to 3.8 Ga represent those that were solidifying after much of the crust was destroyed by the Bombardment. The Acasta Gneiss in the North American cratonic shield and gneisses within the Jack Hills portion of the Narryer Gneiss Terrane in Western Australia are, collectively, the oldest continental fragments on Earth and do not predate the late heavy bombardment. The oldest mineral yet dated on Earth, a zircon from Jack Hills, predates this event but may simply be a fragment of crust left over from this event, contained within a much younger (~3800 Ma old) rock.[citation needed] Some geologists believe they have found 4.28 billion year old rock in Quebec, Canada, though.[9]

This has led to something of a revolution in the understanding of the earliest stages of Earth's history during the Hadean.[10] Older references generally show the Hadean Earth having a molten surface with prominent volcanos, for instance Hadean time. The name referred to the "hellish" conditions assumed on Earth for the time. It is now theorized (although still controversial) that the Hadean surface may have been solid, temperate, and water covered (albeit acidic). This is due to the presence of several particular isotopic ratios which suggest water-based chemistry took place at some point prior to the formation of the oldest rocks.[11]

Of particular interest, Manfred Schidlowski argued in 1979 that the carbon isotopic ratios of some sedimentary rocks found in Greenland were a relic of organic matter. There was much debate over the precise dating of the rocks, with Schidlowski suggesting they were about 3800 Ma old, and others suggesting a more "modest" 3600 Ma. In either case it was a very short time for abiogenesis to have taken place, and if Schidlowski was correct, arguably too short a time. The Late Heavy Bombardment and the "re-melting" of the crust that it suggests provides a timeline under which this would be possible; life either formed immediately after the Late Heavy Bombardment, or more likely survived it, having arisen earlier during the Hadean. Recent studies suggest that the rocks Schidlowski found are indeed from the older end of the possible age range at about 3850 Ma, suggesting the latter possibility is the most likely answer.[12] Schidlowski's argument remains a topic of heated debate.

More recently, a similar study of Jack Hills rocks shows traces of the same sort of potential organic indicators. Thorsten Geisler of the Institute for Mineralogy at the University of Münster studied traces of carbon trapped in small pieces of diamond and graphite within zircons dating to 4250 Ma. The ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-13 was unusually high, normally a sign of "processing" by life.[13]

Three-dimensional computer models developed in May 2009 by a team at the University of Colorado at Boulder postulate that much of Earth's crust, and the microbes living in it, could have survived the Bombardment. Their models suggest that although the surface of the Earth would have been sterilized, hydrothermal vents below the Earth's surface could have incubated life by providing a sanctuary for heat-loving microbes.[14]

  Possible causes

  Gas giant migration

  Simulation showing outer planets and planetesimal belt: a) Early configuration, before Jupiter/Saturn reach 2:1 resonance b) Scattering of planetesimals into the inner Solar System after the orbital shift of Neptune (dark blue) and Uranus (light blue) c) After ejection of planetesimals by planets.[15]

A series of simulations by Gomes et al. start with a Solar System where the gas giant planets are in a tight orbital configuration.[16] This configuration is in itself stable, but assuming a rich trans-Neptunian belt, stray transneptunians interacted with these planets, causing them to migrate slowly during a time of several hundred million years. Jupiter is predicted to migrate inward, whereas the other planets go outwards. By this migration, the solar system became catastrophically unstable when Jupiter and Saturn reached a 2:1 orbital resonance, causing the outer solar system to reconfigure rapidly to a wide jovian system. As these planets migrated, resonances would be "swept" through the asteroid belt and Kuiper belt. These resonances would increase the orbital eccentricity of the objects, allowing them to enter the inner solar system and impact with the terrestrial planets.[1] Recent work suggests that the impactors which caused the LHB were sourced from a now almost entirely depleted inner band of the asteroid belt, close to Mars.[17]

  Late Uranus/Neptune formation

According to one planetesimal simulation of the establishment of the planetary system, the outermost planets Uranus and Neptune formed very slowly, over a period of several billion years.[18] Harold Levison and his team have also suggested that the relatively low density of material in the outer Solar System during planet formation would have greatly slowed their accretion.[19] This "late appearance" of these planets has therefore been suggested as a different reason for the LHB. However, recent calculations of gas-flows combined with planetesimal runaway growth in the outer solar system imply that Jovian planets formed extremely rapidly, on the order of 10 my, which does not support this explanation for the LHB.

  Planet V hypothesis

One such mechanism is presented by the Planet V simulations, that posits the former existence of a fifth planet, smaller than Mars, in the inner solar system, outside the orbit of Mars but inside the asteroid belt. The orbit of this planet was theorized to be nearly circular but meta-stable, and was disrupted at the time of LHB, becoming eccentric, starting to sling asteroids about to collide with the inner planets before ultimately plunging into the Sun.

  Fifth gas giant hypothesis

Another hypothesis has posited an additional fifth gas giant in a trans-Saturnian orbit between Saturn and Uranus. The mooted ice giant is theorised to have been flung out of our solar system after a close encounter with Jupiter, which lost angular momentum as a result and receded further away from the Sun, preserving the relative orbital stability of the inner solar system[20]

  Exosystem with possible Late Heavy Bombardment

Evidence[21] has been found for Late Heavy Bombardment-like conditions around the star Eta Corvi.

  See also


  1. ^ a b Taylor, G. Jeffrey. "Wandering Gas Giants and Lunar Bombardment"
  2. ^ Tera, F.; Papanastassiou, D.A.; Wasserburg, G.J. (1974). "Isotopic evidence for a terminal lunar cataclysm". Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. (22): 1–21. 
  3. ^ Cohen, B. A.; Swindle, T. D.; Kring, D. A. (2000). "Support for the Lunar Cataclysm Hypothesis from Lunar Meteorite Impact Melt Ages". Science 290 (5497): 1754–1755. Bibcode 2000Sci...290.1754C. DOI:10.1126/science.290.5497.1754. PMID 11099411 
  4. ^ Hartmann, William K.; Quantin, Cathy; Mangold, Nicolas (2007). "Possible long-term decline in impact rates: 2. Lunar impact-melt data regarding impact history". Icarus 186: 11–23. Bibcode 2007Icar..186...11H. DOI:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.09.009 
  5. ^ Strom, 1979
  6. ^ Chronology of Planetary Surfaces, section 3.3.1
  7. ^ L. A. Haskin, R. L. Korotev, R. L. Rockow, B. L. Jolliff, Larry A.; Korotev, Randy L.; Rockow, Kaylynn M.; Jolliff, Bradley L. (1998). "The case for an Imbrium origin of the Apollo thorium-rich impact-melt breccias". Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 33 (5): 959–979. Bibcode 1998M&PS...33..959H. DOI:10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01703.x. 
  8. ^ Lithosphere-Hydrosphere Interactions on the Hadean (>4 Ga) Earth, covers many of the Hadean issues and timelines in depth
  9. ^ http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080925-oldest-rocks.html
  10. ^ Revising Earth's Early History
  11. ^ Carbonates' role in the chemical evolution of oceans on Earth & Mars
  12. ^ When Did Life on Earth Begin? Ask a Rock
  13. ^ Rachel Courtland, "Did newborn Earth harbour life?", New Scientist, July 2, 2008
  14. ^ Steenhuysen, Julie (May 21, 2009). "Study turns back clock on origins of life on Earth". Reuters.com. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE54J5PX20090520?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0. Retrieved May 21, 2009. 
  15. ^ R. Gomes, H. F. Levison, K. Tsiganis, A. Morbidelli (2005). "Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets" (PDF). Nature 435 (7041): 466–9. Bibcode 2005Natur.435..466G. DOI:10.1038/nature03676. PMID 15917802. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7041/pdf/nature03676.pdf. 
  16. ^ Gomes, R.; Levison, H. F.; Tsiganis, K.; Morbidelli, A. (2005). "Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets". Nature 435 (7041): 466–469. Bibcode 2005Natur.435..466G. DOI:10.1038/nature03676. PMID 15917802 
  17. ^ Bottke, W.F., et al., 2012, An Archaean heavy bombardment from a destabilized extension of the asteroid belt, Nature, 485, p. 78-81.
  18. ^ Formation of planets around stars of various masses
  19. ^ G. J. Taylor (August 21, 2001). "Uranus, Neptune, and the Mountains of the Moon". Planetary Science Research Discoveries. http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Aug01/bombardment.html. 
  20. ^ Eric B.Ford and Eustace Chiang: "The Formation of Ice Giants in a Packed Oligarchy: Instability and Aftermath: Astrophysics Journal 661:1: 602: 2007: http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/661/1/602?fromSearchPage=true
  21. ^ Spitzer Observations of η Corvi : Evidence at ~1 Gyr for an LHB-Like Delivery of Organics & Water-Rich Material to the THZ of a Sun-Like Star. C.M. Lisse, C. H. Chen, M. C. Wyatt, A. Morlok, P. Thebault, G. Bryden, D.M. Watson, P. Manoj, P. Sheehan, G. Sloan, T.M. Currie, Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts' 42, (March 20, 2011), pg. 2438, Bibcode2011LPI....42.2438L.

  External links



Toutes les traductions de Late_Heavy_Bombardment

Contenu de sensagent

  • définitions
  • synonymes
  • antonymes
  • encyclopédie

  • definition
  • synonym

Dictionnaire et traducteur pour mobile

⇨ Nouveau : sensagent est maintenant disponible sur votre mobile

   Publicité ▼

sensagent's office

Raccourcis et gadgets. Gratuit.

* Raccourci Windows : sensagent.

* Widget Vista : sensagent.

dictionnaire et traducteur pour sites web


Une fenêtre (pop-into) d'information (contenu principal de Sensagent) est invoquée un double-clic sur n'importe quel mot de votre page web. LA fenêtre fournit des explications et des traductions contextuelles, c'est-à-dire sans obliger votre visiteur à quitter votre page web !

Essayer ici, télécharger le code;


Avec la boîte de recherches Sensagent, les visiteurs de votre site peuvent également accéder à une information de référence pertinente parmi plus de 5 millions de pages web indexées sur Sensagent.com. Vous pouvez Choisir la taille qui convient le mieux à votre site et adapter la charte graphique.

Solution commerce électronique

Augmenter le contenu de votre site

Ajouter de nouveaux contenus Add à votre site depuis Sensagent par XML.

Parcourir les produits et les annonces

Obtenir des informations en XML pour filtrer le meilleur contenu.

Indexer des images et définir des méta-données

Fixer la signification de chaque méta-donnée (multilingue).

Renseignements suite à un email de description de votre projet.

Jeux de lettres

Les jeux de lettre français sont :
○   Anagrammes
○   jokers, mots-croisés
○   Lettris
○   Boggle.


Lettris est un jeu de lettres gravitationnelles proche de Tetris. Chaque lettre qui apparaît descend ; il faut placer les lettres de telle manière que des mots se forment (gauche, droit, haut et bas) et que de la place soit libérée.


Il s'agit en 3 minutes de trouver le plus grand nombre de mots possibles de trois lettres et plus dans une grille de 16 lettres. Il est aussi possible de jouer avec la grille de 25 cases. Les lettres doivent être adjacentes et les mots les plus longs sont les meilleurs. Participer au concours et enregistrer votre nom dans la liste de meilleurs joueurs ! Jouer

Dictionnaire de la langue française
Principales Références

La plupart des définitions du français sont proposées par SenseGates et comportent un approfondissement avec Littré et plusieurs auteurs techniques spécialisés.
Le dictionnaire des synonymes est surtout dérivé du dictionnaire intégral (TID).
L'encyclopédie française bénéficie de la licence Wikipedia (GNU).


Les jeux de lettres anagramme, mot-croisé, joker, Lettris et Boggle sont proposés par Memodata.
Le service web Alexandria est motorisé par Memodata pour faciliter les recherches sur Ebay.
La SensagentBox est offerte par sensAgent.


Changer la langue cible pour obtenir des traductions.
Astuce: parcourir les champs sémantiques du dictionnaire analogique en plusieurs langues pour mieux apprendre avec sensagent.

Dernières recherches dans le dictionnaire :

3922 visiteurs en ligne

calculé en 0,312s

   Publicité ▼

Je voudrais signaler :
section :
une faute d'orthographe ou de grammaire
un contenu abusif (raciste, pornographique, diffamatoire)
une violation de copyright
une erreur
un manque
merci de préciser :

Mon compte



   Publicité ▼